Oct 18

None Dare Call it Conspiracy, by Gary Allen ★★★

Who doesn’t want to rule the world? While madmen like Dr. Evil, Pink Panther and James Bond villians, and others have been made the brunt of Hollywood comedies and spy films, it perhaps distracts us from the fact that there may be people who would like to rule the world. Some have been accused of desiring world domination, like Adolf Hitler and Mao TseTung, but history and available evidence suggests otherwise. It is unfortunate that those least accused of desiring world domination are those most obscure to most of us. The effort of this book is to point out those groups and individuals. Allen begins the book by simply stating that the evidence is so overwhelming of a mass conspiracy, that doubting the conspiracy suggests that one is blind to the facts. Yet, Allen fails to provide any substantial proof in this book that such an entity exists. Allen focuses mainly on the international bankers and Council of Foreign Relations (CFR), of which the bankers have an intimacy. Little mention is made of the Bilderberg group, the Club of Rome, the Jesuits and Illuminati, and other hypothetical world conspirators. I’m sure there are many more groups out there. I’d like to rule the world, so, I guess that I am a one-man conspiracy. Allen is prudent enough to disengage himself from the more dark shadowy groups out there, like the Illuminati and Masons. Allen has a good point in this book. It is in the bankers best interest to have a controlling influence on politics, while not having to have a public face. It is in the interest of CFR members to control world policy to their best interest. If one calls it a conspiracy that the bankers and CFR (and Bilderbergers) are intimate, perhaps there is a conspiracy out there.

Much discussion was given to the banking influence at fueling world conflicts. Allen discusses what many already know that bankers such as the Rothschilds were funding both sides of the conflict in both WWI and WWII, and have done much to force conflict to happen. Allen might have included many other major conflicts. He fails to explain precisely why banking would be interested in funding the weaker side of a conflict, knowing that the money will be lost forever. He also fails to include the host of other factors that fuel the wars and conflicts that occur in today’s world. I simply cannot accept the statement of so many conspiracy theorists that it was the bankers were the predominant factor that created the major conflicts of the world. It had to have been greatly multifactorial, with banking simply facilitating and encouraging on the conflicts.

Is it the conspiracy (Allen calls them the Insiders without telling you exactly who they are) that is leading the world to various forms of socialism, whether it be national socialism, fabian socialism, or international socialism (communism)? I doubt it. I can see how fabian style socialism can be desirable by the super-rich such as Soros or Rothschild, since it allows them to control decisions that ultimately serve their own interests. In other forms of socialism, everybody loses except for a single few people. How communism would be desirable to bankers escapes me, yet Allen suggests that ultimately bankers and Insiders would like the entire world under strong socialist monetary control.

Worst for this book is failing to understand that man is inherently evil and self-oriented, and that any position of power will ultimately seek to further one’s own best interests. Allen fails to suggest that events, circumstances, economic cycles, wars, poverty and wealth follow certain paths and laws outside of any evil minded masterplots, and that in all aspects, whether in the big or the small picture, God is in control. So, people will think that they are in control, only if we remain blistfully unaware of them.  Allen provides part of the picture, but not the big picture, of what’s going on out there. And for part of the picture, it is worth reading. The book is a little bit dated, written in 1972 when the USSR was still going strong.


Add comments

One Response to “None Dare Call it Conspiracy”

  1. Onkel Dennis says:

    Allen’s book is a classic on the topic of power elite rule and the nature of their interactions but it is good only as a historical start for those who have a pollyanna view of society. And the book was written in the Cold War context of a half century ago.

    ” If one calls it a conspiracy that the bankers and CFR (and Bilderbergers) are intimate, perhaps there is a conspiracy out there.”

    Maybe Leithart will eventually figure this out. It has perhaps more accurately been called an “inspiracy” in that those in the ruling circle think alike in goals and methods. There are disagreements among them (compare Brzezinski with the neo-cons) but they try to hammer out consensus at Bilderberg and other meetings. Some shadowy higher-level group more directly connected with the Devil also provides them guidance through their association in the Lodge or kindred secret societies, of which they all participate. (Take a look at Alex Jones’ Bohemian Grove video for an eye-opener on that.)

    “Allen calls them the Insiders without telling you exactly who they are”

    The CFR roster is in the public domain as well as Bilderberg attendees to a great extent – not that the latter intend this.

    “How communism would be desirable to bankers escapes me, …”

    Well, this is where the power-elite ideology that you think is important (from the Leithart review) comes in, and it is more than just a superficial thing with them; It is Talmudic Cabalist Judaism at the core. The Manifesto of the Jew Karl Marx defining Communism is almost a plagiarized version of Jesuit Jew Adam Weishaupt’s Illuminati founding document. It accidentally fell into the hands of the Bavarian govt when lightning struck down an Illuminati courier on horseback heading for the French Jacobins with revolutionary info. The Bavarian govt outlawed the Illuminati but like a chameleon, it resurfaced, mostly in Italy, from whence grew Italian Communism, and the P-2 Masonic Lodge, of which the Vatican has secret members (gulp).

    ” whether in the big or the small picture, God is in control. ”

    Yes, but to say this comes across as a blithe platitude unless some content is provided that shows how it is that God is in control, and that can be done to a great extent (not that the mind of God is known as such!). One might just as well say that the Devil is in control if you look pessimistically enough at the social order. That is the value of geopolitics – to bring out the more general principles of social behavior through which the actions of God (and the Devil) can be discerned in the affairs on humanity.

Leave a Reply


preload preload preload